Paul Krugman

@paulkrugman ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Aug. 6, 2022

Created

Fri Jul 08 20:17:28 +0000 2022

Likes

134

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Paul Krugman @paulkrugman

In other words, underlying wage growth may be somewhat less than the headline numbers. No idea how big a deal this is, but certainly no reason to focus on the nonsupervisory number 7/ — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 8, 2022

Preceded By

Paul Krugman @paulkrugman

A corresponding concept for wages would focus on workers who are hired with relatively long contracts, with wages set with an eye on the future rather than current supply and demand. And managers are *more* likely to fit that concept than lower-wage, high turnover workers 6/ — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 8, 2022

Followed By

Paul Krugman @paulkrugman

Bottom line: wage growth still looks too high to be compatible with Fed target, but not by all that much. Maybe less than a percentage point 8/ — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 8, 2022