Adam Rifkin 🐼🌻

@ifindkarma ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked March 22, 2020

Created

Sat Jan 18 17:48:53 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPad

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Adam Rifkin 🐼🌻 @ifindkarma

@TheBeatWithAri So are Republicans only willing to remove an impeached President for lying about sex under oath? If so, please ask President* Trump under oath about the campaign finance felonies for which he is unindicted co-conspirator Individual-1. https://t.co/FkJzww0PIz — PolitiTweet.org

@RealColBuzby @TheBeatWithAri I think ultimately that will be their argument will be. That no president can be impeached.

Posted Jan. 18, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Adam Rifkin 🐼🌻 @ifindkarma

@Teri_Kanefield It’s astonishing that... 🔹 No facts are in dispute, and instead we are now arguing whether the facts constitute a set of actions that warrant removing President* Trump from office 🔹 Most Americans already know whether we believe he should be removed https://t.co/jlhK1cwHpy — PolitiTweet.org

It’s telling that not one of the Republicans who spoke in the House as it approved the transfer of the impeachment… https://t.co/jCbQ5CfnGB

Posted Jan. 18, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Adam Rifkin 🐼🌻 @ifindkarma

@MontyBoa99 @TheBeatWithAri Alan Dershowitz brought up those very same Federalist Papers #65 to make the claim that an impeached President should not be removed from office for abuse of power. It’s like we agree on the facts, and those facts justify completely opposite conclusions. https://t.co/AtseYeMlcY — PolitiTweet.org

(Thread) Senate Trial Let’s talk about the difference between issues of fact and issues of law. Bonus: This threa… https://t.co/jp4gkF57nK

Posted Jan. 18, 2020 Hibernated