(((tedfrank)))

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@Tonulukk @Not_the_Bee The court didn’t take the case. But your premise is wrong, all it needed was a pathological liar wanting to harass his ex, who had already agreed to a court order enjoining her against medical transitions. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@potatospectrum @Not_the_Bee Most of your examples have nothing to do with constitution. Father is perfectly capable of enforcing FF&CC here if he hires competent legal help. No shortage of attorneys who’d want to help. And if California is so lawless, how would different SCOTX decision matter? — PolitiTweet.org