(((tedfrank)))

@tedfrank ↗

Deleted Yes

Hibernated No

Last Checked Nov. 8, 2022

Created

Tue Nov 08 20:09:27 +0000 2022

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Unavailable

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@lefineder @monitoringbias “6000%” = 60x. Learn basic math. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 8, 2022 Deleted after 42 seconds

Preceded By

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@lefineder @monitoringbias Could be 14/50000 for one population and 2/400000 for the other. That’s 56x and consistent with n=16 and the study size. All sorts of algebra can find other combinations where this is plausible. 60x of a very small number is still a small number. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 8, 2022

Followed By

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@lefineder @monitoringbias Ok, 15/1100 vs 1/448900 is 6121x. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 8, 2022