(((tedfrank)))

@tedfrank ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Oct. 11, 2022

Created

Sat Oct 01 13:20:50 +0000 2022

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPad

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

“Evidence is relevant if it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence.” Proof? No. Evidence? Yes. Certainly reporters wouldn’t be giving charitable interpretations of a Trump statement like this, much less ignoring it. — PolitiTweet.org

@tedfrank You think this is evidence of a covert US sabotage mission?

Posted Oct. 1, 2022

Preceded By

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

If Trump blabbed about our covert sabotage mission against a nuclear power that could set off World War III, just because he’s insecure and wanted to look tough in front of a reporter, we’d never hear the end of it. Has anyone written about the Biden chip on the shoulder? https://t.co/AEt60eqaKN — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 1, 2022

Followed By

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

Even if US didn’t engage in sabotage (and my p-value of that is still greater than 0.5 until I see more evidence), this sort of Biden reckless statement does more than infinitesimally increase risk of nuclear holocaust. Where’s the BAS moving the doomsday clock a few seconds? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 1, 2022