(((tedfrank)))

@tedfrank ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Oct. 6, 2022

Created

Wed Sep 28 01:47:30 +0000 2022

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

Don’t take my word for it. Read our briefs and the judicial decision and decide for yourself whether reasoning beyond “the law says it bans harassment, harassment is bad, therefore the law must be good” is required. https://t.co/7g4LaRFbTL — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 28, 2022

Preceded By

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

If Pennsylvania’s Section 8.4(g) said “Don’t discriminate. Don’t harass.” and limited the definitions of those words to federal law, @HamLincLaw wouldn’t be litigating. Intellectually dishonest of Reuters and Greene to suggest the overbroad rule applies only to “creepy bigots.” https://t.co/vFseuTdZmD — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 28, 2022

Followed By

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@CaseyMattox_ @johnpelwood Not a typo, it’s a 2017 post. John, question is whether any cases not announced as a grant on Thursday might still be a relist and eventual grant on Monday, and if so, whether a September distribution affects that. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 28, 2022