(((tedfrank)))

@tedfrank ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Aug. 31, 2022

Created

Wed Aug 24 15:17:08 +0000 2022

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPad

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@chriswithans @brian_wolfman @Fred_Marwan @fedjudges Right, we agree on that. Brian was asking whether it applies to other scenarios, and I was distinguishing the issue of standing (yes, there’s standing for the ridiculous claim) versus the merits. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 24, 2022

Preceded By

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

Related thread on which states will currently tax debt forgiveness, though a single-digit percentage tax may not qualify as injury. The figure may need to be 80% or 90% rather than 30%. — PolitiTweet.org

Due to an ARPA provision, federal student loan forgiveness wouldn't be a federally taxable event, but it would trig… https://t.co/LM4Mg1k5Dp

Posted Aug. 24, 2022

Followed By

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@brian_wolfman @Fred_Marwan @chriswithans @fedjudges Standing is just injury in fact and redressability. So the fact that an absurd claim has standing doesn’t slippery-slope a particular standing argument. All sorts of absurd claims have standing. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 24, 2022