Philip Dunne

@Dunne4Ludlow ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked April 21, 2022

Created

Mon Nov 08 12:02:10 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Philip Dunne @Dunne4Ludlow

The problem is that this duty has not been enforced. The new duties and the focus on preventing sewage discharges which this growing awareness and debate has prompted, will place greater pressure on the EA, Ofwat and DEFRA to require investment in treatment infrastructure, — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 8, 2021

Preceded By

Philip Dunne @Dunne4Ludlow

Claims that the Govt amendment weakens existing legislation are also wrong. The water companies have an existing Section 94(1)(b) duty to treat sewage “effectually”, which has existed since 1991, and the new amendment does not replace nor override this duty. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 8, 2021

Followed By

Philip Dunne @Dunne4Ludlow

including through nature-based solutions like reed beds. DEFRA needs to strengthen its guidance to Ofwat at the end of this year to increase capex on treatment by each company. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 8, 2021