Ben Popken

@bpopken ↗

Deleted Yes

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked July 2, 2022

Created

Sat Oct 19 05:41:52 +0000 2019

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Unavailable

Ben Popken @bpopken

If @HillaryClinton meant @TulsiGabbard is a Russian "asset" in the intelligence world sense of "fully controlled source" former CIA officer @john_sipher says he thinks that’s wrong. But if Hillary meant it in the everyday English sense, “asset is a reasonable word,” he said. https://t.co/ErOrNyinSY — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 19, 2019 Deleted Hibernated

Preceded By

Ben Popken @bpopken

It was @TulsiGabbard who injected the "Russian asset" catchphrase in the conversation. When reports noted her alignment with some Russian interests and amplification by Russian media she accused them of calling her a "Russian asset" -- a straw man argument https://t.co/GwrVGRxfvB https://t.co/0N2u76zKql — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 19, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Ben Popken @bpopken

“Asset” in intelligence vocab is a directly controlled source, pros tell me. Indirect amplification is not control. Asset in casual English is “thing of value.” @HillaryClinton should have been clear, cited evidence, about which re @DrJillStein, and if she included @TulsiGabbard. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 19, 2019 Hibernated