Glenn Greenwald

@ggreenwald ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked March 18, 2022

Created

Fri Nov 19 00:08:19 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

@WilliamTurton I'm not defending the order -- I think it's blatantly unconstitutional, having learned more about it just now -- but I think the judge's rationale is: these privileged docs relate directly to the litigation and the court therefore has an interest in finding out how NYT got them. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 19, 2021 Hibernated

Preceded By

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

@JonShiffman @ErikWemple Totally agree. NY state judges will sign almost any OSC without even reading. But in a case like this, with a clause ordering the country's largest newspaper not to publish docs, no matter how temporarily, one would think they'd have to have a good reason not to strike that part. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 19, 2021 Hibernated

Followed By

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

@WilliamTurton Yeah, the temporary restraint is insane and blatantly unconstitutional, and the order barring them from soliciting the docs even worse. I'm sure it will be quickly vacated - by the judge or on appeal - but it should never have been issued, obviously. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 19, 2021 Hibernated