Greta Van Susteren

@greta ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked July 12, 2022

Created

Sun Jul 03 12:04:14 +0000 2022

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPad

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Greta Van Susteren @greta

here is someone ON THE RECORD(Akerman)but then anonymous ‘committee aide’-an intern? Lawyer?How do we weigh the remark by a ‘committee aide?’ This is overuse of anonymous sources;we know who Akerman is which is good but not ‘aide’;⁦ ⁦@washingtonpost⁩ https://t.co/8APXEXhiNm — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 3, 2022

Preceded By

Greta Van Susteren @greta

See last tweet…further on in the article it has people quoted on the record (not anonymous) which is important to the readers ⁦@washingtonpost⁩ - overuse of anonymous sources is a problem in journalism; get people on the record! https://t.co/naQuJ9c2RM — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 3, 2022

Followed By

Greta Van Susteren @greta

I am not saying that about entire paper. What I am saying is that the editor of this article permitted an unnecessary overuse of anonymous sources which can lead to a misunderstanding — PolitiTweet.org

@greta @washingtonpost You’re saying that Washington Post reporting is “misleading”?? https://t.co/Lcp4PhPQW3

Posted July 3, 2022