Greta Van Susteren

@greta ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Oct. 10, 2021

Created

Wed Nov 11 01:14:58 +0000 2020

Likes

220

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPad

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Greta Van Susteren @greta

You don’t know if a suit is frivolous until it is filed and it is time to present evidence and evid is reviewed by the judge/ct;you are pre judging before the case has gotten to ct; it may be or may not be frivolous but you need to get it to ct to decide — PolitiTweet.org

@greta Nothing wrong with frivolous lawsuits with zero evidence submitted? You are a lawyer, right, Greta?

Posted Nov. 11, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Greta Van Susteren @greta

Your bio says “concerned citizen” - I suggest you be concerned when an organization is trying to destroy the judicial process by intimidation ..there is nothing wrong w/ going to court and nothing wrong w/ lawyers representing people...you may need one some day. — PolitiTweet.org

it iwas considered abusive and your response re @gtconway3d is also abusive in the same way so the difference? https://t.co/gTB3EmlqCi

Posted Nov. 11, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Greta Van Susteren @greta

Every case must be judged on its own merits - that is the way the judicial branch works;it should not take sides, but examine the facts of each case and apply the law — PolitiTweet.org

@greta Oh. So we should ignore the precedent set by all the lawsuits the Trump campaign has had thrown out already?

Posted Nov. 11, 2020 Hibernated