MIT Technology Review

@techreview ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Aug. 22, 2022

Created

Thu Jul 29 15:56:33 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

MIT Technology Review @techreview

Yet that did little to quell questions about the role his research may have played in furthering scientists’ ability to modify coronaviruses in potentially dangerous ways. Such questions have dogged Baric since 2014. https://t.co/HLamXP12SM — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 29, 2021 Hibernated

Preceded By

MIT Technology Review @techreview

Baric clarified according to the NIH, the research in question did not qualify as GOF, none of the SARS-like coronaviruses he’d used were closely related to SARS-CoV-2 , and his collaboration with the Wuhan Institute of Virology had been minimal. https://t.co/E9kBvkbAA9 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 29, 2021 Hibernated

Followed By

MIT Technology Review @techreview

Baric became the reluctant spokesperson for GOF and believes the research is essential to the development of vaccines and other countermeasures against emerging viruses, a project he has been engaged in for more than 20 years. https://t.co/dR9aAdCE3k — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 29, 2021 Hibernated