MIT Technology Review

@techreview ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Aug. 22, 2022

Created

Mon Jun 28 18:29:37 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

MIT Technology Review @techreview

(1/2) When Chan read the letter, she could already see a problem. In debunking the possibility that the virus was the product of extensive genetic engineering, they’d ruled out other, simpler scenarios. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 28, 2021 Hibernated

Preceded By

MIT Technology Review @techreview

The authors of the letter had looked carefully at the genome of the covid-19 virus and said they couldn’t find any sign it had been purposely engineered. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 28, 2021 Hibernated

Followed By

MIT Technology Review @techreview

(2/2) For instance, a normal virus collected from bats in the wild, if brought to Wuhan, could have somehow slipped out. “I was like, ‘They are very mistaken,’” says Chan. “They haven’t thought of all these other plausible ways for a lab leak to occur.” — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 28, 2021 Hibernated