Zack Beauchamp

@zackbeauchamp ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Dec. 20, 2021

Created

Tue Nov 30 15:00:50 +0000 2021

Likes

262

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Zack Beauchamp @zackbeauchamp

I should probably read the book, but I find arguments like this repellant. US involvement in World War II is the only reason I'm alive, my grandparents not brutally murdered by the most evil government in history. We *should* mythologize that victory https://t.co/u08VCBNXXT — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 30, 2021

Preceded By

Zack Beauchamp @zackbeauchamp

@lionel_trolling It's even worse because when people criticize "1619," mostly what they mean is the editor's framing and that one line about the Revolution in the lead essay — not the vast bulk of the essays. Whereas the body of Rufo/Lindsay's work is complete garbage — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 30, 2021

Followed By

Zack Beauchamp @zackbeauchamp

These arguments always take the same form: the fighting was brutal, Allied troops committed atrocities, the US leadership didn't really care about the Holocaust. Concede all of that, and the fact remains: absent US intervention, the Nazis would have completed their genocide. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 30, 2021