Zack Beauchamp

@zackbeauchamp ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Sept. 11, 2020

Created

Thu Aug 06 19:06:15 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Zack Beauchamp @zackbeauchamp

@CharlesFLehman @DouthatNYT I haven't seen a text, it's 8-10 in Kurtz's summary that worries me here. What does it mean to fail to "uphold their claims to respect free expression?" The Chicago Principles, for example, hold individuals accountable https://t.co/OnK9jvpX0e — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 6, 2020

Preceded By

Zack Beauchamp @zackbeauchamp

@CharlesFLehman @DouthatNYT The lawsuit section is objectionable for (roughly) similar reasons to the objections the Florida ACLU had to a similar stat ebill https://t.co/mcX60ceBTL https://t.co/48U1Xy7Wyy — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 6, 2020

Followed By

Zack Beauchamp @zackbeauchamp

@CharlesFLehman @DouthatNYT The Cotton bill would, per Kurtz's summary, hold universities that have speech codes that cover individual conduct (like Chicago) liable for attempts to disrupt speech — the "booing" scenario the Florida ACLU warned about — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 6, 2020