Zack Beauchamp

@zackbeauchamp ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Jan. 7, 2022

Created

Tue Jun 02 14:20:21 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Zack Beauchamp @zackbeauchamp

@davidrkadler @EricLevitz Straightforwardly, the argument is: It's bad that the police gassed peaceful protesters. It's even more alarming that they did so illegally, in a way that demonstrates officer willingness to break the law on Trump's behalf. It is NOT gassing would have been OK if done legally. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 2, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Zack Beauchamp @zackbeauchamp

@davidrkadler @EricLevitz No, he's not saying that. Literally the first line of the piece is arguing that the images of police attacking protestors were "chilling" even absent the 7 pm context. This a really shameful misinterpretation. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 2, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Zack Beauchamp @zackbeauchamp

@davidrkadler @EricLevitz What's worse, you're trying to make some kind of grand ideological argument about "technocracy" based on a dubious interpretation of Matt when our publication as a whole has been extremely critical of police conduct here. Isn't your aim to build bridges between progressives? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 2, 2020 Hibernated