Zack Beauchamp

@zackbeauchamp ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked March 16, 2021

Created

Tue Nov 05 17:57:12 +0000 2019

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Zack Beauchamp @zackbeauchamp

@OsitaNwanevu I think it's because he's making a value judgment. It's not just "films of X type are being crowded out by films of Y type" but "X films are being crowded out by Y films, *and that's bad* because X films are art while Y films are not, and thus superior" — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 5, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Zack Beauchamp @zackbeauchamp

@ChristianM62 It's a little hard to tell. It really does seem like he's not only outlining two traditions, but also making a claim that one is objectively superior. Too bad op-eds by directors aren't more philosophically precise! — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 5, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Zack Beauchamp @zackbeauchamp

@DanFosterType @RhetoricPJ So I think you can cleanly separate moral statements from aesthetic ones if you can argue for a specific meta-ethical theory that explains what the property of being morally wrong/right actually is. I think there are plausible theories for that but not in the aesthetic case — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 5, 2019 Hibernated