Zack Beauchamp

@zackbeauchamp ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Oct. 1, 2020

Created

Thu May 23 19:12:10 +0000 2019

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web Client

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Zack Beauchamp @zackbeauchamp

@michaelbd @willwilkinson @DamonLinker "Adult humans" there is meant literally, not metaphysically. You can argue that this is anachronistic, but so too is the entire exercise of trying to tar a legal argument formulated for the present context by saying it might have had bad consequences 150 years ago. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 23, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Zack Beauchamp @zackbeauchamp

@michaelbd @willwilkinson @DamonLinker Read the line more carefully ("other adult humans.") — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 23, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Zack Beauchamp @zackbeauchamp

@michaelbd @willwilkinson @DamonLinker That's wildly unfair! The argument is that it's wrong and illiberal to prohibit other people from medical procedures that you deem morally wrong on religious grounds — but their faith or (non-faith moral) tradition views differently. Disagree, sure, but it's not prejudice. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 23, 2019 Hibernated