Judd Legum

@JuddLegum ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked March 14, 2023

Created

Fri Mar 03 23:37:55 +0000 2023

Likes

667

Retweets

133

Source

TweetDeck

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Judd Legum @JuddLegum

3. Ghosh said the allegations against Murdoch (if proven) could constitute an "illegal in-kind contribution, warranting an investigation and possible enforcement to uphold the law and protect our elections" https://t.co/CPb77MuNiI — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 3, 2023

Preceded By

Judd Legum @JuddLegum

2. @SGhoshCLC, a campaign finance law expert w/@campaignlegal, told me that "a corporation or its agents would be breaking the law if they were to give anything of value – including intangible things like information – to a campaign or its agents in connection w/an election" — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 3, 2023

Followed By

Judd Legum @JuddLegum

4. There is a broad media exception to the prohibition of corporate in-kind contributions. But Rick Hasen, a law professor at UCLA and an expert in election law, says it wouldn't apply because the "ads were not shared for the purpose of newsgathering or opinion writing." — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 3, 2023