Profile Image

Judd Legum

@JuddLegum ↗

Deleted No
Hibernated No
Last Checked Feb. 9, 2023

Created

Thu Jan 26 20:28:44 +0000 2023

Likes

218

Retweets

49

Source

TweetDeck

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available
Profile Image

Judd Legum @JuddLegum

9. This legislation is likely unconstitutional. The First Amendment protects the right of the public to speak and receive information. There are a few narrow exceptions, like obscenity, but Lefor's bill is much broader. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 26, 2023

Preceded By

Profile Image

Judd Legum @JuddLegum

8. Lefor argued that a child's exposure to these kinds of books is associated with "addiction, poor self-esteem, devalued intimacy, increasing divorce rates, unprotected sex." He did not provide any evidence to back up these claims. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 26, 2023

Followed By

Profile Image

Judd Legum @JuddLegum

10. Nevertheless, Lefor is financially backed by major corporations that claim to support LGBTQ rights: Johnson & Johnson (@JNJNews) @ATT @nexteraenergy @conocophillips https://t.co/8opAS3NRLb — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 26, 2023