Judd Legum

@JuddLegum ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Nov. 26, 2022

Created

Mon Nov 07 15:35:57 +0000 2022

Likes

2,661

Retweets

336

Source

TweetDeck

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Judd Legum @JuddLegum

6. Even though @DavidSacks apparently consulted Wikipedia before tweeting, he is wrong. Parody is explicitly protected speech under the Supreme Court precedent (Hustler v. Falwell). By banning people for engaging in parody, must is censoring people for legal speech — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 7, 2022

Preceded By

Judd Legum @JuddLegum

@DavidSacks @elonmusk 5. @DavidSacks attempted to justify the suspension by claiming these parody accounts were violating the law and engaging in conduct that is not protected by the First Amendment. https://t.co/CXzH0tduJj — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 7, 2022

Followed By

Judd Legum @JuddLegum

@DavidSacks 7. Sack's response: "OH, YOU ARE AGAINST BANS NOW?!?" is nonsense I never said I was a "free speech absolutist, whatever that means To have a functional social media platform, you will probably have to prohibit some speech that isn't against the law https://t.co/d7dtCH5QSX — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 7, 2022