Judd Legum

@JuddLegum ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked April 19, 2022

Created

Thu Apr 07 12:48:24 +0000 2022

Likes

118

Retweets

Source

TweetDeck

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Judd Legum @JuddLegum

5. The folks behind this bill have been at this for some time. 18 of the bill's 24 co-sponsors signed a 2017 legal filing arguing that while Obergefell recognized same-sex marriages, the ruling did not apply to parental rights (It was unsuccessful) https://t.co/cQVW0CXg09 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 7, 2022

Preceded By

Judd Legum @JuddLegum

4. The bill's authors assert that the Supreme Court lacked "the authority to eradicate, alter, or modify the pre-legal and thus natural institution of marriage between a man and a woman acknowledged in human civilization throughout time." https://t.co/cQVW0CXg09 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 7, 2022

Followed By

Judd Legum @JuddLegum

6. Will this convoluted bill undermine national same-sex marriage rights? It might seem unlikely. But that's exactly what Texas did with reproductive rights. No one took it seriously but, with this SCOTUS, it's working. So bills like this matter. https://t.co/cQVW0CXg09 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 7, 2022