Judd Legum

@JuddLegum ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Aug. 29, 2022

Created

Wed Jun 30 21:01:51 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

TweetDeck

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Judd Legum @JuddLegum

9. A much more straightforward reading of the facts was there was no promise in 2005 but once Castor realized (10 years later) that a new prosecution of Cosby would be a political problem for him he recast the nature of his 2005 decision. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 30, 2021 Hibernated

Preceded By

Judd Legum @JuddLegum

8. So back to the "evidence" Cosby "relied" on this promise. Again, nothing in writing. But the court says the evidence is that he testified in the civil trial without invoking the 5th Well, in 2004, Cosby voluntarily talked to the police without invoking the 5th — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 30, 2021 Hibernated

Followed By

Judd Legum @JuddLegum

10. The major of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court believes Castor, when his story makes no sense. The dissent makes quick work of Castor's tale. It's 5 pages long and worth reading. https://t.co/qqJfZ8nkRT https://t.co/JOXVgECXZ3 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 30, 2021 Hibernated