Judd Legum

@JuddLegum ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Aug. 29, 2022

Created

Wed Feb 03 13:26:45 +0000 2021

Likes

210

Retweets

Source

TweetDeck

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Judd Legum @JuddLegum

3. Trump's lawyers argue that the key word is AND. They argue that because the constitution says punishments are limited to removal AND disqualification it means you have to be removed before you can be disqualified They call it a "condition precedent" https://t.co/M9Y479xzwv — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 3, 2021 Hibernated

Preceded By

Judd Legum @JuddLegum

2. The argument from Trump's lawyers hinges on this language from the Constitution: "[j]udgment in cases of impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor…" https://t.co/M9Y479xzwv — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 3, 2021 Hibernated

Followed By

Judd Legum @JuddLegum

4. BUT THAT IS NOT HOW THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE WORKS. "And" does not create a condition predicate. If I ask you what sodas you have and you say Coke AND Dr. Pepper that doesn't mean I can only have Dr. Pepper if I order a Coke first. https://t.co/M9Y479xzwv — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 3, 2021 Deleted Hibernated Just a Typo