Judd Legum

@JuddLegum ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked April 29, 2021

Created

Wed Oct 14 12:35:25 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

TweetDeck

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Judd Legum @JuddLegum

4. Thomas also notes courts have protected platforms against cases that are based on the theory they have created a defective product. He pointed to a case against Grindr where the company said it was unable to stop someone from impersonating the plaintiff https://t.co/wMnvWidiaN — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 14, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Judd Legum @JuddLegum

3. Thomas also says section 230 protects platforms that decide to remove content, but only when it's done in good faith. Now tech companies are protected whenever they remove content, even if the plaintiff alleges the purpose is racially discriminatory https://t.co/wMnvWidiaN — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 14, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Judd Legum @JuddLegum

5. Thomas argues this goes too far. It's created a strange agreement between Thomas, who is accused of sexual harassment, and lawyers like @cagoldberglaw, who sues harassers Goldberg told me Thomas' opinion was "excellent and clear-eyed" https://t.co/wMnvWidiaN — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 14, 2020 Hibernated