Judd Legum

@JuddLegum ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Dec. 31, 2020

Created

Tue May 26 01:36:06 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

TweetDeck

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Judd Legum @JuddLegum

The New York Times also has ad revenue etc. But the point stands because you can make a very nice living off of 2300 subscribers. And once you get there you can build to 4600 and 6600. Is it easy. No, it's quite hard. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 26, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Judd Legum @JuddLegum

The number of subscribers you need to make this model work is not astronomical. Think about the NYT. It has 3.9 MILLION digital subscriptions. Sounds like a lot, right? But the NYT also has 1700 journalists. That's only 2300 subscribers per journalist — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 26, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Judd Legum @JuddLegum

But the point is, you don't need 1 million paid subscribers. You just need a few thousand. It's something that is obtainable for quite a few people -- especially experienced journalists who know what they are doing and how to break news and just got laid off — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 26, 2020 Hibernated