Tweet by @DavidCornDC

David Corn @DavidCornDC

Sure, Eli. Let’s call it a “policy choice.” Not betrayal. A foreign adversary attacks the US to help elect Trump. Then Trump and Flynn do nothing about that. And it’s just a “policy choice.” Clever description. Much nicer than “aiding and abetting” a foreign enemy. Good work. — PolitiTweet.org

After Russia invaded Georgia, Obama undermined W’s sanctions for that aggression and pursued a reset. That was a po… https://t.co/ZDB40gdyIq

Posted May 30, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

David Corn @DavidCornDC

RT @gtconway3d: “What is most scandalous and damning in these transcripts is what Flynn did not say. “At no point does Flynn castigate Kis… — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 30, 2020 Retweet Hibernated

Followed By

David Corn @DavidCornDC

One did. He found Flynn had lied and had violated foreign lobbying laws. BTW, Flynn was briefed in 8/16 that Russia was attacking the US election. Did he say anything? Do anything? Then or after the election? No, he served Trump, who denied the Russian attack. No patriots there. — PolitiTweet.org

If only a special counsel had looked into that aiding and abetting https://t.co/tSv2DN2cg6

Posted May 30, 2020 Hibernated