Chris Murphy

@ChrisMurphyCT ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked July 17, 2022

Created

Thu Oct 08 16:26:29 +0000 2020

Likes

2,343

Retweets

603

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Chris Murphy @ChrisMurphyCT

7/ But Wisconsin HAD provided proof. It just wasn't ENOUGH for Barrett, who clearly had read plenty of NRA-funded studies arguing against background checks. So, Barrett thinks that gun laws are unconstitutional so long as a study exists that says more guns equal less crime. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 8, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Chris Murphy @ChrisMurphyCT

6/ Second, she said that legislatures had to "prove" that the gun law they passed would reduce violence, and claimed Wisconsin hadn't provided that proof. Thus, Barrett said the restriction was unconstitutional. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 8, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Chris Murphy @ChrisMurphyCT

8/ This is all REALLY radical stuff. Coney Barrett will be the 5th vote to rewrite the 2nd Amendment. SCOTUS will be able to rule bans on assault weapons and background checks unconstitutional. The plan to legislate gun policy from the bench. We can't let it happen. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 8, 2020 Hibernated