Chris Murphy

@ChrisMurphyCT ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Sept. 30, 2020

Created

Fri Oct 04 12:39:20 +0000 2019

Likes

13,807

Retweets

3,578

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Chris Murphy @ChrisMurphyCT

We now know that Trump was using access to the White House to get a foreign government to help destroy his political rival. There was an explicit quid pro quo: open an investigation into my rival, and I will invite you to the White House. An important moment for our democracy. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 4, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Chris Murphy @ChrisMurphyCT

If you're a Republican who hung your hat on "no quid pro quo!", what do you do tomorrow? The texts make 100% clear: 1. Our top diplomat in Kiev says there was an "investigation for aid" quid pro quo. 2. Everyone knew there was a "investigation for meeting" quid pro quo. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 4, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Chris Murphy @ChrisMurphyCT

The texts make it pretty clear the aid was being withheld until Zelensky chose to investigate. But it’s never been necessary to show an explicit quid pro quo. It was always implicit, and the fact that our top diplomat believed the quid pro quo existed proves that. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 4, 2019 Hibernated