Tweet by @ericbolling

🏴‍☠️ERIC BOLLING 🏴‍☠️ @ericbolling

Excuse me: that would be the case.. and shouldn’t it? After all... if there are zero witnesses testifying to quid pro quo or bribery coming directly from @realDonaldTrump how can there be a case? “Speculation” is not an aggravating factor. — PolitiTweet.org

Republicans shooting at heart of where they believe Dem argument is vulnerable. Sondland never heard Trump describe… https://t.co/QDYsQhUf9v

Posted Nov. 20, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

🏴‍☠️ERIC BOLLING 🏴‍☠️ @ericbolling

Anthony.. If you’d listened to the full testimony rather than to the #FakeNews, you would have heard Amb Sondland say WHY that was the case: the Ukrainians tend to make promises in private and not follow through. @realDonaldTrump wanted it to be public to *insure they’d perform. — PolitiTweet.org

Sondland made it clear @realDonaldTrump only demanded Zelensky ANNOUNCE an investigation into his political rival… https://t.co/7LRa0SxIQv

Posted Nov. 20, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

🏴‍☠️ERIC BOLLING 🏴‍☠️ @ericbolling

Skillful~ Ambassador Gordon Sondland somehow threads the needle and becomes the star witness for both Democrats and Republicans. https://t.co/8dnXbPsIq2 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 20, 2019 Hibernated