Elizabeth Bruenig

@ebruenig ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked March 6, 2021

Created

Thu Feb 18 16:19:54 +0000 2021

Likes

285

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Elizabeth Bruenig @ebruenig

Death qualified juries are, for instance, more likely to convict at large than other juries. This means a person facing the death penalty has a heightened chance of conviction simply because of the composition of the jury itself. How is that fair? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 18, 2021 Hibernated

Preceded By

Elizabeth Bruenig @ebruenig

Then there's the problem of juries. SCOTUS has ruled that prosecutors can exclude people who object to the death penalty on juries in capital cases. This results in juries that are -- prior even to hearing the case -- "death-qualified," which turns out to be a curious sample. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 18, 2021 Hibernated

Followed By

Elizabeth Bruenig @ebruenig

Juries are also much, much more likely to sentence a black person to death for killing a white person than any other racial perpetrator/victim combination. Black people who kill black people in extremely similar circumstances face much lower chances of being sentenced to die. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 18, 2021 Hibernated