U.S. EPA

@EPA ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Oct. 25, 2022

Created

Wed Nov 13 16:05:20 +0000 2019

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

U.S. EPA @EPA

The proposed science transparency rule maintains protecting confidential personal information just as other federal health agencies regularly do. This rule will ensure regulatory science underlying EPA’s actions are available in a manner sufficient for independent validation. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 13, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

U.S. EPA @EPA

EPA is committed to scientific integrity & transparency. Science transparency doesn't weaken science, quite the contrary.Requiring transparency will strengthen science. Scientists will be required to publish hypothesis & experimental data for other scientists to review & discuss — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 13, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

U.S. EPA @EPA

The proposed rule allow studies like the Harvard Six City study to be used. EPA has not rejected or otherwise eliminated that option in anyway. In fact, the supplemental makes it clearer that such studies must be properly considered & takes comment from the public on this issue. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 13, 2019 Hibernated