Senate Democrats @dscc
Great Q for Thom Tillis: How can you conclude there is a “lack of evidence” after you voted repeatedly to block additional evidence from being heard? https://t.co/Qh4Km5irLm #NCSen — PolitiTweet.org
Created
Wed Feb 05 01:03:00 +0000 2020
Likes
34
Retweets
23
Source
TweetDeck
View Raw Data
JSON DataView on Twitter
Likely Available
Senate Democrats @dscc
Great Q for Thom Tillis: How can you conclude there is a “lack of evidence” after you voted repeatedly to block additional evidence from being heard? https://t.co/Qh4Km5irLm #NCSen — PolitiTweet.org