b-boy bouiebaisse

@jbouie ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked July 19, 2022

Created

Tue Jul 12 14:49:04 +0000 2022

Likes

435

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPad

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

b-boy bouiebaisse @jbouie

the conceptual point here is that the legal status of a black person could change from state to state. in kentucky, they might be property, compelled to work under an owner who had legal rights in state and federal courts. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 12, 2022

Preceded By

b-boy bouiebaisse @jbouie

…which “settled” the issue by stating that black people had no constitutional rights. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 12, 2022

Followed By

b-boy bouiebaisse @jbouie

in ohio, however, they would be free, under the domain of state courts and a state government that had no obligation to honor the property claims of an owner in kentucky. the question was how the federal government would square the legal circle of a person who was also property. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 12, 2022