b-boy bouiebaisse

@jbouie ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Oct. 22, 2022

Created

Thu May 12 19:38:37 +0000 2022

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

b-boy bouiebaisse @jbouie

@ericowensdc @NGrossman81 "large state vs. small state," "rural vs. urban" these are all post-hoc justifications for a decision whose origins lay much more in the decision not to subsume the states into a larger federal entity than it did in any anxiety over the influence of "large states" — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 12, 2022 Hibernated

Preceded By

b-boy bouiebaisse @jbouie

@ericowensdc @NGrossman81 Small populations vs large populations weren't really the issue. None of the small state delegates had any theoretical reason for their support of equal state representation. It was a hard-nosed political move based upon their desire to retain influence. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 12, 2022 Hibernated

Followed By

b-boy bouiebaisse @jbouie

@ericowensdc @NGrossman81 insofar that the large states were distinct, it is because the largest of them — virginia and south carolina — had huge slave populations. otherwise, each state contained a diversity of interests and there was no correlation between bigness or smallness on those interests — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 12, 2022 Hibernated