b-boy bouiebaisse

@jbouie ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Oct. 22, 2022

Created

Fri May 06 15:45:52 +0000 2022

Likes

1,004

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

b-boy bouiebaisse @jbouie

this is a good question and i'm not sure if there is a single reason. my immediate guess is its one part a lasting legacy of lost cause education, and one part a very common conflation of "anti-slavery" and "abolition" https://t.co/gia6A3s1GM — PolitiTweet.org

@jbouie Why do you think we get taught the “Lincoln didnt even want to end slavery, the confederacy declaring indep… https://t.co/cInKs9DGN3

Posted May 6, 2022 Hibernated

Preceded By

b-boy bouiebaisse @jbouie

@ItsA_TBex yes. and that antagonization was heightened by the fact that fugitive slaves provided testimony to what slavery was like, and this testimony made its way into the northern public. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 6, 2022 Hibernated

Followed By

b-boy bouiebaisse @jbouie

lincoln was anti-slavery — meaning he supported a politics aimed at ending slavery — but, at least before the war, was not an abolitionist, meaning he did not support the immediate end of slavery with no compensation. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 6, 2022 Hibernated