b-boy bouiebaisse

@jbouie ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked May 31, 2022

Created

Wed Jan 19 18:02:58 +0000 2022

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

b-boy bouiebaisse @jbouie

@ProfBZZZ @sullydish A straightforward reading of the tweets in question is that Sullivan agrees with Manchin that the filibuster was meant/intended to check majorities in accordance with the Founders intended. This is not true. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 19, 2022 Hibernated

Preceded By

b-boy bouiebaisse @jbouie

@ProfBZZZ @sullydish Sure, I'm not disputing that. I am disputing that supermajority requirements were a part of this (they were not) and I am disputing that the intent, as per Sullivan's tweets, was some form of "minority rule," which is what Sargent was critiquing. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 19, 2022 Hibernated

Followed By

b-boy bouiebaisse @jbouie

@ProfBZZZ @sullydish What is true is that the specific design of the national legislature — a broad mandate for congressional power, bicameralism, and senators elected from state legislatures — was meant to curb the aforementioned "excess democracy." — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 19, 2022 Hibernated