b-boy bouiebaisse

@jbouie ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Oct. 1, 2021

Created

Wed Apr 14 23:17:03 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

b-boy bouiebaisse @jbouie

if an accurate reading of your lede depends on connecting the clause “for the purpose of” to a sentence roughly 500 words down the page, then there is a structural problem in the writing — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 14, 2021 Hibernated

Preceded By

b-boy bouiebaisse @jbouie

crank, my sincere advice is you should lay out the thrust of your argument within your 1st 200 words & that throat-clearing for the length of a column before getting to your point — which even then is unclear — is a recipe for being misunderstood as often as you seem to be. — PolitiTweet.org

"For the purpose," i.e., their purpose, as I later state explicitly, is "they argue openly that the Georgia law wou… https://t.co/Hk4fw4OB0g

Posted April 14, 2021 Hibernated

Followed By

b-boy bouiebaisse @jbouie

If I were your editor Crank, I would have suggested you write something like: “Democrats believe the Georgia law is a gambit to help the GOP win elections by undermining fair elections, but it is their coordination of an unaccountable corporate response that is anti-democratic.” — PolitiTweet.org

Thesis of the column first, support for it second. This is a fine model and only breaks down when people are too da… https://t.co/i9Qanm5hvI

Posted April 14, 2021 Hibernated