b-boy bouiebaisse

@jbouie ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Oct. 1, 2021

Created

Wed Apr 14 22:09:08 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

b-boy bouiebaisse @jbouie

@dodgingcars Yes, from *our perspective* 3/5 is better than 5/5, but for *them* that isn’t really what the debate was about. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 14, 2021 Hibernated

Preceded By

b-boy bouiebaisse @jbouie

@dodgingcars Three-fifths was chosen because a similar debate had already been settled a few years earlier regarding taxation and that was the ratio Congress agreed to. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 14, 2021 Hibernated

Followed By

b-boy bouiebaisse @jbouie

@sparker417 because northerners thought that was silly. if slaves would count 100% then so should horses or plows or what have you. there was broad agreement on *some* slave representation, and 3/5ths was an agreed upon ratio from a previous debate. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 14, 2021 Hibernated