b-boy bouiebaisse

@jbouie ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Dec. 21, 2020

Created

Mon Oct 12 21:34:21 +0000 2020

Likes

461

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

b-boy bouiebaisse @jbouie

I wrote about this! If you are going to use 1801 as precedent then 1802 counts too! https://t.co/rxLSGTx4zJ — PolitiTweet.org

Then the victorious Democratic-Republicans changed the size of the federal judiciary in 1802 and again in 1807. https://t.co/6KOxeVL2zq

Posted Oct. 12, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

b-boy bouiebaisse @jbouie

RT @mattyglesias: Then the victorious Democratic-Republicans changed the size of the federal judiciary in 1802 and again in 1807. — PolitiTweet.org

Reminder: Chief Justice John Marshall was nominated by a defeated lame duck Federalist President Adams and confirme… https://t.co/RfGDqlfV54

Posted Oct. 12, 2020 Retweet Deleted Hibernated

Followed By

b-boy bouiebaisse @jbouie

the basic problem for “expanding the court is an unacceptable response to our attempt to cement it as an ideological ally” is that the courts do not exist outside of the system of checks and balances. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 12, 2020 Hibernated