b-boy bouiebaisse

@jbouie ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Dec. 21, 2020

Created

Fri Aug 07 18:19:23 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

b-boy bouiebaisse @jbouie

@JHWeissmann Yes. Because eliminating the filibuster makes *something* more likely to happen then *nothing*, then there is a greater incentive to negotiate to ensure that the something reflects your interests. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 7, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

b-boy bouiebaisse @jbouie

@AlexisCoe i admit you were the first person i thought of when i heard it — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 7, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

b-boy bouiebaisse @jbouie

@JHWeissmann And also, a Republican like Romney or Murkowski — who would not want to be the 50th or 51st vote for anything — could negotiate knowing that it will be harder to hold their votes against them. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 7, 2020 Hibernated