Conor Friedersdorf

@conor64 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Jan. 17, 2023

Created

Wed Dec 21 21:33:08 +0000 2022

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for Android

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@isisvande @SamRochadotcom @ChrisSchaef I disagree that *that* is the prevailing spirit of the law. It seems to me that it is intended to be aimed at left-racial essentialism but could well chill speech far beyond that. The kind of statement I think it is targeting is something like "All white people are oppressors." — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 21, 2022

Preceded By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@isisvande @SamRochadotcom @ChrisSchaef Agree RE free speech. RE Jim Crow, "was determined by the flawed logic of that system" is different than "is necessary determined" present tense are very different — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 21, 2022

Followed By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@SamRochadotcom @isisvande @ChrisSchaef I chose equality under the law first because it is less ambiguous and because mainstream conservatives--National Review and Ben Shapiro, say--explicitly favor it. What social equality entails and requires is much more ambiguous and contested, but let's turn to that. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 21, 2022