Conor Friedersdorf

@conor64 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Dec. 8, 2022

Created

Tue Nov 22 22:35:36 +0000 2022

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

A q for @realchrisrufo: are you comfortable with FL arguing "Even if the 1st Amendment did apply here, Florida’s compelling interest in stamping out discrimination based on race and other immutable characteristics amply justifies any burden on speech the Act may impose”? — PolitiTweet.org

Irony alert: If DeSantis' lawyers succeed in persuading the courts that they should be able to override the 1st Ame… https://t.co/FbFMvqRF9B

Posted Nov. 22, 2022

Preceded By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

Here is a direct quote from a DeSantis administration lawyer: "Even if the 1st Amendment did apply here, Florida’s compelling interest in stamping out discrimination based on race and other immutable characteristics amply justifies any burden on speech the Act may impose.” — PolitiTweet.org

Irony alert: If DeSantis' lawyers succeed in persuading the courts that they should be able to override the 1st Ame… https://t.co/FbFMvqRF9B

Posted Nov. 22, 2022

Followed By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

I would also like to know if Richard Delgado agrees with DeSantis lawyers that"Even if the 1st Amendment did apply here, FL’s compelling interest in stamping out discrimination based on race... amply justifies any burden on speech the Act may impose.” — PolitiTweet.org

A q for @realchrisrufo: are you comfortable with FL arguing "Even if the 1st Amendment did apply here, Florida’s c… https://t.co/VeXiuuNtJR

Posted Nov. 22, 2022