Conor Friedersdorf

@conor64 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Aug. 23, 2022

Created

Wed Aug 17 21:32:54 +0000 2022

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for Android

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@ScottGreenfield @davidminpdx @Popehat If the Taliban bought a small Akron Ohio museum it would be within its lawful rights to burn all works inside that depicted naked women. Would @davidminpdx find it dangerous for me to criticize them for doing so as enemies of free artistic expression? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 17, 2022

Preceded By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@ScottGreenfield @davidminpdx @Popehat I don't get it. As I said at the time, the Dr. S estate is within its legal rights to stop publishing the Cat in the Hat if it wants. And I think it would be bad if they did. There is no contradiction there. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 17, 2022

Followed By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@davidminpdx @ScottGreenfield @Popehat People have a right to shun songs released by gay people, and a right to try to convince others to do so. When they exercise that right in that way, we should criticize them. And there are other exercises of that right that also warrant criticism. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 17, 2022