Conor Friedersdorf

@conor64 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked March 23, 2022

Created

Sun Mar 20 20:55:03 +0000 2022

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@page88 @adamdavidson @davidshor @jonronson directly related to work, not a non-work thing that we were punishing with loss of livelihood; that there is no chilling effect to worry about in the SG case; you go through the deeper reasons and see how that was distinguishable — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 20, 2022

Preceded By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@page88 @adamdavidson @davidshor @jonronson I would point out that fabulism, to use the SG example, was a clearly established rule, violation of which got one fired; that the firing was due to the outcome of an investigation that correctly found him guilty, not caving to a pressure campaign; that the sin was — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 20, 2022

Followed By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@page88 @adamdavidson @davidshor @jonronson That said, there's a process/outcome divide in some cases, where we might ultimately agree someone deserved to be fired, or convicted, on the facts, even though we're rightly uncomfortable with, say, a lack of due process, or a jury tainted by mob pressure. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 20, 2022