Conor Friedersdorf

@conor64 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked March 21, 2022

Created

Tue Mar 15 21:53:05 +0000 2022

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for Android

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@vituperativeerb @edcu My claim: "There is an important (legal) distinction between saying controversial things and preventing someone from saying controversial things. A protester saying *shut the fuck up* is one thing. Yelling it repeatedly in a way that prevents an event from happening is another." — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 15, 2022

Preceded By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@vituperativeerb @edcu The point is that the legal analysis in that case would be much different than a law saying *you can't tell a speaker to shut the fuck up* which would clearly be struck down as unconstitutional. The two things are legally distinguishable — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 15, 2022

Followed By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@vituperativeerb @edcu So you don't think a well-crafted, viewpoint neutral time/place restriction narrowly tailored to allow a recurring debate event to proceed at a university without audience members drowning out the speakers with repeated shouts would definitely pass constitutional muster? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 15, 2022