Conor Friedersdorf

@conor64 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked March 8, 2022

Created

Wed Mar 02 00:22:21 +0000 2022

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

A person in mode one may or may not be at cross-purposes with a person in mode two depending on the latter's method of influence. For example, if a 2 seeks to influence via logical persuasion, a 1 might be glad to engage. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 2, 2022

Preceded By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

2) *Others believe they know some or all of what's right with regard to Ukraine, and they want to influence rather than to better understand. Twitter helps them to reach others to influence with their engagement or amplification.* (One can of course engage in both mode 1 and 2) — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 2, 2022

Followed By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

But if a 2 tries to influence by propaganda, or wielding emotion-driven stigma, or intimidating via the implicit threat of pile-on in, spurring preference falsification or creating a chilling effect, that 2 is the enemy of 1s, making the project of 1s less possible. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 2, 2022