Conor Friedersdorf

@conor64 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Nov. 28, 2021

Created

Mon Nov 15 23:09:38 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for Android

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@ijbailey @Noahpinion @mattyglesias The point is that it treated 1619 as the symbolic "true founding" not that it was a literal claim, whatever that would mean. Many of us instead believe 1776 was the true symbolic founding in addition to being the literal one. If you would like another example I can provide one: — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 15, 2021

Preceded By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@ijbailey @Noahpinion @mattyglesias Sure. But sometimes, as with 1619, people want to say something rather extreme, like that 1619 was America's true founding, and then to pretend that they didn't say any such thing when called upon to defend the assertion against pushback. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 15, 2021

Followed By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@ijbailey @Noahpinion @mattyglesias The 1619 Project's architect once likened the New York Times to a slave master's house and her role their as dismantling that house. That strikes me as overly harsh in the way Noah is talking about, albeit with regard to the NYT rather than America. I think his point is, — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 15, 2021