Conor Friedersdorf

@conor64 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Oct. 25, 2021

Created

Thu Oct 21 21:26:22 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for Android

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@shyam_ala @NAChristakis @aashaik16 @monicacbell @SajaSpearman The argument I've made is that, regardless of whether the email was offensive or not, the response of administrators was abusive, for reasons I laid out in detail. So my position doesn't turn on offensiveness either way. But let's turn to that now. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 21, 2021

Preceded By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@shyam_ala @NAChristakis @aashaik16 @monicacbell @SajaSpearman I'd ask you to ponder if you'd feel as sanguine about formal complaints of that sort and administrative responses of that sort of you felt like administrators were at odds with rather than aligned with your beliefs about what is offensive. Wouldn't you worry about power abuses? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 21, 2021

Followed By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@shyam_ala @NAChristakis @aashaik16 @monicacbell @SajaSpearman To me, the text itself has a clear ambiguity: reading it without knowing the intent of the author, it is unclear whether he intends or doesn't intend to evoke the racial associations that some but not all people have or are even aware of with regard to "trap house." — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 21, 2021